Strike marriage from california law
Both sides in the case made clear that they intended to take the case before the Supreme Court in hopes of prompting it to settle once and for all an issue that has been fought out in courts, legislatures and ballot boxes since at least a case in Minnesota. That said, there is no guarantee the court will take it. Whatever the legal nuances of the decision — and lawyers were battling about how far-reaching it would prove to be — the decision reverberated throughout political circles, from the presidential campaign to state legislatures.
Still, the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, coming at a time when Washington State seems poised to become the seventh state to legalize same-sex marriages, seems likely to add to what members of both parties said was a sense of momentum.
Chad Griffin, the president of the American Foundation for Equal Rights , which challenged Proposition 8, noted that polls in the past year had shown public support for same-sex marriage steadily increasing, a significant change from just a decade ago. Sweeney, a Democrat and president of the Senate, who abstained in a vote on a same-sex marriage bill two years ago, is now championing one that is to come up for a vote next Tuesday.
Proponents of Proposition 8 expressed disappointment, but said they were not surprised, given the nature of the Ninth Circuit, which they view as liberal, and predicted the ruling would fail before the Supreme Court. Several said the decision was narrow enough that it was more unlikely now that the Supreme Court, if it accepted the case, would use it to establish a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Pugno, general counsel for the ProtectMarriage.
Same-sex marriage in California
Pugno said he had not decided whether he would appeal to the Supreme Court or ask a larger panel of the Ninth Circuit Court to review this decision. View all New York Times newsletters. Douglas NeJaime, an associate professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, said the narrowness of the decision could influence the Supreme Court to take a road it often favored: issuing narrow and incremental decisions, not sweeping ones.
The emotional repercussions were on display as Spencer Perry, 17, the son of one of the couples who initiated the case, turned out to praise it. An article on Wednesday about the decision by a federal appeals court panel to overturn a voter-approved initiative banning same-sex marriage in California misstated the surname of a son of one of the same-sex couples who were plaintiffs in the case.
It is Spencer Perry, not Spencer Stier. His parents are Kris Perry and Sandy Stier. Tell us what you think. Please upgrade your browser.
- NPR Choice page.
- sex offenders in grand blanc michigan?
- revocable trust and tax id number!
See next articles. Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you're not a robot by clicking the box.
- cashiers checks for buying cars.
- Federal judge strikes down California’s ban on same-sex marriage – The Mercury News.
- stueben county new york public records?
- California Ban on Gay Marriage Is Struck Down - The New York Times?
Invalid email address. Please re-enter.
State of Civil Unions: California Court Strikes Down Marriage Ban
Today, we stand in solidarity with millions of Californians, who can finally say 'I do' to the person they love. GLAAD has been working on shaping the media narrative around marriage equality. Visit www.
Learn more about the facts of the case and the implications of this ruling. Skip to main content. Search form. Recent search terms transgender zeke survivor glaad awards trump accountability project spirit day. Share this Page.